<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] RAA
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] RAA
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ceczT5cTn3rEWYTy48AOc2bzPQSBymCVJGwC9G3oSl0HICv7b/66BL1rpYys/dyQbvuh40HGed6J6AxMO6Q1QkZJ+mYaQEtQy8PXJMKIh/Ew+Qy1E7zy4cIDmHmRszMIGfmVYX6T73FH92VHQ1uQEV3+qBH0AOxVW6eOYbXgyB8=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am convinced that this is going to be a very hot topic with very little registrant/individual user representation in the formal ICANN task forces and WGs. too many view the RAA as a contract between the parties with no Third Party Beneficiary Rights. I believe the opposite is true; That the RAA is only a contract for the benefit of the individual domain name holder.
Registerfly is still not resolved and this still effects thousands and it is hardly news anymore. No one has even shown interest here for weeks, save Danny.
So I ask for volunteers to run a GA WG on the RAA.
Eric
---------------------------------
Give spam the boot. Take control with tough spam protection
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|