<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] keeping expired domains by a registrar
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] keeping expired domains by a registrar
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stacy.burnette@xxxxxxxxx, halloran@xxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cJC03wyKcni2XAI1xlkG0Dx4f5Tzn3/V4gXjPqCCMqNVPSDbdGzw9CB097mhfwsp0ERh+oJ/811Zb5kqyd2uFJe0ikaGvaZu/HIomYVReuUKtrpvrgPmD4WggIt17Y7egk2EZAu72GBPRyUrSFZ4hufVjibOjGNR13S0lPvqO8s=;
- In-reply-to: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A02B43615@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Stacy Burnette,
In your capacity as ICANN's Director of Contractual
Compliance, I would appreciate a formal determination
as to whether the "direct transfer clauses" in most
registrar Terms of Service agreements stand in
violation of ICANN's Expired Domain Deletion Policy --
please note the correspondence below for a further
explication of the issue.
I have copied this correspondence also to Deputy
General Counsel Dan Halloran. I look forward to
clarification of this issue from ICANN staff.
Thank you for your attention to this matter,
Danny Younger
--- "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Chuck:
>
> Most registrars now have some kind of similar direct
> transfer clause.
> The things to look for are whether a registrant can
> opt out of it -- as
> one can in our clause below -- and whether the
> registrant may share in
> the proceeds of a post-expiration auction of the
> domain name -- as we
> also provide.
>
> In the past, most of these names were being grabbed
> by a few registrars
> in the drop pool and auctioned off post-deletion
> with no benefit to the
> former registrant.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jon Nevett
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:22 AM
> To: Danny Younger; Bashar Al-Abdulhadi
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] keeping expired domains by a
> registrar
>
> I wonder how many registrars have clauses similar to
> this?
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is
> strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please
> notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original
> transmission."
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danny Younger
> [mailto:dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:48 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck; Bashar Al-Abdulhadi
> > Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ga] keeping expired domains by a
> registrar
> >
> > Chuck,
> >
> > One of the problems that we registrants are facing
> stems from
> > Terms of Service Agreements deliberately designed
> to
> > circumvent the Expired Domain Deletion Policy.
> For example,
> > consider this clause in the Network Solutions
> Service
> > Agreement version 7.7.7:
> >
> > "Should you not renew the domain name during any
> applicable
> > grace period, you agree that unless you notify us
> to the
> > contrary we may, in our sole discretion, renew and
> transfer
> > the domain name to Network Solutions or a third
> party on your
> > behalf (such a transaction is hereinafter referred
> to as a
> > "Direct Transfer"), and your failure to so notify
> us after
> > the domain name expiration date shall constitute
> your consent
> > to such a Direct Transfer."
> >
> >
> >
> > --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Bashar,
> > >
> > > Registrars should be able to address this better
> than me
> > because they
> > > work with it everyday, but the clause that I
> thought was especially
> > > relevant was the following:
> > >
> > > "3.7.5.3 In the absence of extenuating
> circumstances (as defined in
> > > Section
> > > 3.7.5.1 above), a domain name must be deleted
> within
> > > 45 days of either the
> > > registrar or the registrant terminating a
> registration agreement."
> > > Extenuating circumstances are clearly spelled
> out in
> > Section 3.7.5.1
> > > and any that are not listed must be approved by
> ICANN. So
> > my question
> > > is this: if no extenuating circumstances exist,
> may a
> > registrar keep a
> > > name longer than
> > > 45 days before deleting it and still be in
> compliance with this
> > > policy?
> > >
> > > Chuck Gomes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________
> > ______________________
> > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
> (and love
> > to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
> > http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
> >
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|