<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Registerfly
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Registerfly
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wrjI0C/pzmli+s6qYeCa2iBR4EknMWyNxlIgBHPVLkVBseYddMbSG4UmWjCZrto+shwke19RDuyiwnU1gSJQa27VoU9vPC8y0XW9pmYYldGW4JVC6LXrIopDAE/Vs8Y04mssfX0CIIIFM5maMK4+XGgUfyx7zrvDLMEabGlctec= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It would appear that this continuing saga -/-, nightmare for some, has shed irrevocable light on ICANNs problem with enforcing it's contracts. I am not talking regulatory enforcement of laws, quite simply the expected enforcement of existing contracts.
We should not sit idly by and say nothing. We should form a WG to research and debate and finally produce a position paper on the registrar issue. Probably labeled the GA RAA WG. I am hoping that Danny Younger will consider leading this effort.
This article (although basically from a registrants perspective) is a good read to get one up to date on the issues; http://www.webhostdir.com/news/articles/shownews.asp?id=20064
These issues are at the core of the stability of the net for users, and especially for registrants. It futher illuminates the need for a registrant constituency.
Eric
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|