<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Chair election dates
I think that many of us hope to add that to the goals. I personally would
like to rebuild the GA. But I imagine part of the discussion in the
beginning for this list is to decide on short and long term goals. The
structure being put into place will faciliate that IMO.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Chair election dates
I agree that future voting participation will aid the credibility of the
current effort. I have a couple of questions for the list members.
My understanding of the results of the February voting: a neutral chair
(having a term of ?) will facilitate debate, and the vice chair will do
the same when filling in for the chair. Is this correct?
Is there a goal to accomplish anything other than debate/discuss ICANN
issues? Are we trying to re-constitute the GA into something resembling
its status under the DNSO? It may be helpful in gaining voting
participation to clarify the goals of this effort.
-Rod
On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
At 02:23 a.m. 15/03/2007, Eric wrote:
I have asked Joop to neutrally set dates for the close of nominations
and then voting.
I'll oblige. Nominations for Chair and vice-chair can be made on this
list until the 25th of March, 00:00 GMT
All nominations must be seconded in order to be valid.
Acceptances must be received by this list at the latest on the 28th of
March, 00:00 GMT
Voting (or endorsement as the case may be) will start immediately on the
28th of March, 2007 at 00:00 GMT and will close on April 2, 00:00 GMT
May I ask Chris to tabulate the nominations that have been received so
far?
To increase participation in this vote and in future polls, I would
encourage all members of this list to register as GA-voters on the
www.pollingbooth.info site
A low participation is not going to help the credibility of this effort.
-joop-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|