ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] next voting options

  • To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] next voting options
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:23:09 -0800
  • Cc: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <5.0.2.1.2.20070206111634.01bcc300@mail.terabytz.co.nz>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Joop and all,

 NO Vice chair.  CO-Chair.

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 05:40 a.m. 6/02/2007, Dominik Filipp wrote:
> >My options are more or less similar
> >
> >1. Elect a Chair and Co/Vice Chair with the chair being also a
> >Representative.
> >2. Elect a single Chair being also a Representative.
> >3. Elect a single Chair who does not represent us and acts more as
> >moderator.
> >
> >Options like 'others, decribe...' are confusing and should not be
> >considered.
>
> The first vote established that people still wanted an election. The
> various options were barely discussed prior .
> The consideration of a replacement chair (wrongly named co-chair) actually
> came up after the vote was already up when someone remembered how WG -E had
> floundered when the chair walked away. The comment box served usefully to
> gather additional options. This time we can be more exhaustive and there is
> no need for an "others,..describe"
>
> FoIlowing the discussed options may I propose:
>
> 1. Elect one neutral Chair to facilitate the debate.
> 2. Elect a neutral Chair to facilitate the debate and a Vice chair to
> replace him during absence.
> 3. Elect a Chair to facilitate the debate *and* to act as spokesman or
> representative of the GA.
> 4. Elect a Chair and a Vice Chair to facilitate the debate *and* to act as
> spokesman or representative of the GA.
> 5. Elect a Chair and a co-Chair with unspecified division of tasks and powers.
>
> >We haven't specified the voting rules yet. What does valid voting look
> >like? When can the voting result be considered 'Yes/No' legitimate?
> >Maybe simple questions, but should be mentioned.
>
> Until there is a GA charter that includes valid voting rules we can only
> rely on reasonable common sense.
> A reasonable time to vote.(5 days)  Non-voters cannot invalidate the vote
> of those who vote.
>
> Before starting nominations and election, we will also need some consensus
> (and a vote) on election rules.
> Please try to formulate some.
>
> Let us all try to learn from what went wrong with icannatlarge.org
>
> --Joop--
> http://www.pollingbooth.info/generalassemblysignup/
>
> www.icannatlarge.com

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>