RE: [ga] Vote

["Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>]

My options are more or less similar

1. Elect a Chair and Co/Vice Chair with the chair being also a
Representative.
2. Elect a single Chair being also a Representative.
3. Elect a single Chair who does not represent us and acts more as
moderator.

Options like 'others, decribe...' are confusing and should not be
considered.

The Representative role can start as simple moderator but expected to
gradually evolve to GA representant to the outside world.

We haven't specified the voting rules yet. What does valid voting look
like? When can the voting result be considered 'Yes/No' legitimate?
Maybe simple questions, but should be mentioned.

Dominik

________________________________

From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of kidsearch
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 4:52 PM
To: Hugh Dierker; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote


When we did the WG for the names council, we used the voting booth.. I
agree more participation is definitely needed though.
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Hugh Dierker <mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>  
To: kidsearch <mailto:kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  ; ga
<mailto:ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote
	
	
I was in the second WG here and been here ever since. I don't recall a
WG that went of list.
perhaps you are thinking of the sublist idea. I liked it but most hated
it. But alas that was back when the GA really worked as a GA. I think
your solution is a good one though. If you can just get people to go
participate in voting.
	 
Eric