Re: [ga] RE: Whois more in detail

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with you Joop. There are a lot of issues that could have been dealt with through it.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joop Teernstra 
  To: kidsearch 
  Cc: icann whois ; ga 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:37 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] RE: Whois more in detail


  At 05:14 a.m. 11/01/2007, kidsearch wrote:



    By the way, the at large was not a dot commer organization. It was for all users.
     
  Chris, 

  The ALAC speaks for users. Its first recognized RALO does as well.

  But "Users" are such a diverse group that no clear cut  action program (such as protecting property rights) can be expected from those who purport to represent them.

  This is why the "at large" as recommended for iCANN by Carl Bildt and his 400.000 $ study commission was to be a voting organization of Domain name holders. Owners with a property stake in the DNS management.

  For ICANN that idea was too threatening.


  --Joop--

  www.icannatlarge.com