Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0

["Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Veni,

At ICANN's request, hundreds of messages were posted for PUBLIC COMMENT at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-tld-agreement ,
http://forum.icann.org/lists/info-tld-agreement and
http://forum.icann.org/lists/org-tld-agreement , over 99% were in OPPOSITION
to the proposed contracts.To any rational adult, that nearly unanimous
consensus would constitute the wishes of the public and any actions to
support those wishes would be considered for the benefit of the public.

Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Prophet Partners Inc."
<Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry
agreements by 13-0


> At 02:18 PM 08.12.2006 '?.'  -0500, kidsearch wrote:
> >I have to agree. But it is not unexpected. The ICANN Board has
> >absolutley no regard for the public wishes or benefit. Yes, Veni,
> >since the vote was unanimous, obviously you are included in that.
>
> It's good you mention that. It also makes a lot of sense to see who
> of the directors / former directors reads the least ;), and you know that.
>
> However, now that I am not on the Board, I am more free to talk, too.
> There have always been people bashing ICANN for one or another
> decision. Can you define what you mean by "public wishes or benefit"?
> Is the GA list representing the "public wishes or benefit"? Or it's
> the GNSO council? Or someone else?
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski