ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] court oversight

  • To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] court oversight
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WAzZWkD7pyYF84yWb1fiZcn3qN6Rid18RElz1vqKAPkqp38lQhhq7KNGnzPghZwsrbn1B+cq2LDVnaKgWeHx2WwcQjVwNZM05GWJMKlcnvmyISRVN3U36x8SIbsgL5wdSo0fYQXuZ1V8AoMZ+H3PnqYQOGoTbfdSKQ3atIgEnk8= ;
  • In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20061016001628.01e22230@renesys.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Good point here but how does shutting down ones business help to recover damages?
  The injunction if  there be one merited should be limited to taking the plaintiff off the spam list.
   
  e

Martin Hannigan <hannigan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  
>
> > 
> http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=standards_legal_issues&articleId=9004111&taxonomyId=146
> >



This article is interesting in the laymans perspective as to
jurisdiction of the resources, i.e. when a resource is operated
by a US corporation subject to the US Courts, it can and does
make orders of a technical nature i.e. "terminate service" "seize
equipment" and other things.

It looks to me like the cleaner way to do this would be
to order TUCOWS to lock the NS and then order the physical
layer seized. My business experience tells me that they could
easily get this order enforced as part of recovering the judgement
that is already entered.

We have a similar problem with root operators since 92% of the
resources are run by US entities.


-M<






--
Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff Network Operations
hannigan@xxxxxxxxxxx 



 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>