<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] more et al
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] more et al
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JwmENfat9/JB2hgeUej3qM0pC9IN1CSAUWIBkpff+bEICho89KF4OnjPj1zbydu/sZg3f/vKXLAur4LOGyhYw9lV0awbW1m6fhcbUQJljUBRjjRimlVLWv4sp8BLdnuoAM73Bvr8riZy+QlDjrf0JPPCyyCr1iozJwA8e/O14bI= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This article is quite good. But it leaves one asking a lot of why questions?
Had the author interviewed more perhaps we could get Spamhaus' and the courts' thinking.
http://www.technologynewsdaily.com/node/4803
e
---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|