ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] court oversight

  • To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] court oversight
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=K8uTij64IbO5Uh26AA+3xAPUYc46p1KjPnWTItXkcn2iWqB0DjxkMxC7XKUeGwtlxwEEwjGwNA01xOKScWLhET+KPv/4QOaAxezAu6Qy9O0ut86q4wB0ExhLjkhJ02jkPBfjGa+CdgX1OK8+nWbIzNmPBlY0CWulAnCDmdCkbA4= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Great article here. (although it lacks a little of the legal nuances involved)
  Clearly it is not a court issued proposed order but one prepared by plaintiff and under consideration. ICANN was not named and therefor not before the court.
  The article though points out quite nicely a compelling argument to extend the umbrella of governmental immunity under the umbrella of the DoC to protect against such internationally unpallatable rulings.
   
  http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=standards_legal_issues&articleId=9004111&taxonomyId=146
   
  e

 		
---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>