Re: [ga] price policy

["Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Veni,

The argument for increasing domain prices to reduce spam is the equivalent
of saying that prices for knives should be increased to reduce the number of
murders. Far more legitimate registrants than spammers would be negatively
impacted from such changes.

Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "elliot noss" <enoss@xxxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] price policy


> I was also thinking that way, but recently I got some complaints from
> normal businesses, complaining from the low-cost domain names as
> sources for spam. People register millions of domain names; then they
> create fake content, and make money from PPC. That is, they use the
> low prices of domain names to make money out of spam. They say the
> majority of spam comes from .info, .org and other cheap (< $ 1 ) domains.
>
> veni
>
> At 11:19 AM 10.10.2006 '?.'  -0400, elliot noss wrote:
> >that is an easy one. no.
> >
> >On 10-Oct-06, at 10:06 AM, Veni Markovski wrote:
> >
> >>Everyone has opinion on the price policy for TLDs.
> >>
> >>I hear arguments about the roof of the prices, but I haven't seen
> >>anything on the foundation. So, my questions is, should there be
> >>some regulation for the minimum required price for TLD?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Sincerely,
> >>Veni Markovski
> >>http://www.veni.com
> >>
> >>check also my blog:
> >>http://blog.veni.com
> >>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
>
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com
>
>
>
>
>