RE: [ga] price policy

["Thomas Barrett - EnCirca" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Veni,

This might be true but it is not a valid reason for ICANN to mandate a floor
on pricing.

 If AOL or Microsoft controlled their own TLD and gave away domains to users
of Windows or ISP subscribers, they could handle the Spam/Scam issues that
might arise.

Tom


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Veni Markovski
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:00 PM
To: elliot noss; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] price policy

I was also thinking that way, but recently I got some complaints from normal
businesses, complaining from the low-cost domain names as sources for spam.
People register millions of domain names; then they create fake content, and
make money from PPC. That is, they use the low prices of domain names to
make money out of spam. They say the majority of spam comes from .info, .org
and other cheap (< $ 1 ) domains.

veni

At 11:19 AM 10.10.2006 '?.'  -0400, elliot noss wrote:
>that is an easy one. no.
>
>On 10-Oct-06, at 10:06 AM, Veni Markovski wrote:
>
>>Everyone has opinion on the price policy for TLDs.
>>
>>I hear arguments about the roof of the prices, but I haven't seen
>>anything on the foundation. So, my questions is, should there be
>>some regulation for the minimum required price for TLD?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Veni Markovski
>>http://www.veni.com
>>
>>check also my blog:
>>http://blog.veni.com
>>


Sincerely,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com

check also my blog:
http://blog.veni.com