<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Notes from LSE Call yesterday
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Notes from LSE Call yesterday
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:54:26 -0400
- References: <20061007201424.49671.qmail@web52212.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Any proposal that does not allow for more than half of the influence and
decision-making process to be representative of individual users lacks the
abilty to represent users properly.
The idea that the registries and registrars, even combined, have more or
even equal say on things as individual users have is ludicrous in my honest
opinion.
Millions of individual users should have more say than a few business
representatives.
I cannot support a system that does not believe that the rights and needs of
individual users, BY THEIR OWN VOICE, outweighs the rights of registries,
registrars, IP interests, business owners, ISPs, etc.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://icann.thingsthatjustpissmeoff.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>;
<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Notes from LSE Call yesterday
> Chris,
>
> The GNSO is an organization. At the moment it is an
> organization without a roster of individual members --
> it has six organizational members, the constituencies.
> The LSE Report proposes membership for individuals
> (that would then elect to participate within
> constituency structures).
>
> The LSE has suggested:
>
> 1. a constituency that mergers the registries and
> registrars (not a very bright idea in my opinion)
> 2. a constituency that merges the BC, ISP, and IP
> constituencies
> 3. a constituency that merges ALAC structures with
> the NCUC and that also includes domain name holders
> (another not-so-well-thought-out idea).
>
> These are just recommendations, but they will probably
> be enacted unless either someone proposes another plan
> that has greater merit, or serious opposition from
> ICANN's contracting parties is voiced.
>
> Danny
>
>
> --- kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > A GNSO membership option allows for individual
> > representation.
> >
> > Can you expand on that danny? When I asked how to
> > join the gnso i was told I had to form or join an
> > org to do so. I don't consider that individual
> > representation or membership. What? Join an org that
> > can join an org that can join an org that cannot
> > join ICANN but only make suggestions?
> >
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.0/465 - Release Date: 10/6/06
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|