<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [Ecommerce] LimeWire slams RIAA members' 'illegal online cartel'
- To: Michelle Childs <michelle.childs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [Ecommerce] LimeWire slams RIAA members' 'illegal online cartel'
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:25:56 -0700
- Cc: a2k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ecommerce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ip@xxxxxxxx, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <2124.212.46.150.54.1159360054.squirrel@QuestMail.FutureQuest.net>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michelle and all,
It is clear that ICANN is also seemingly engaged in much
the same thing. However as the RIAA is closely associated
with ICANN on and at several levels, no surprise...
Michelle Childs wrote:
> <snip>
>
> A much more interesting line of defence is LimeWire's attack against the
> music industry. It says the case is ?part of a much larger conspiracy to
> destroy all innovation that content owners cannot control and that
> disrupts their historical business models?. The RIAA and its members are
> using the law for anti-competitive means, not to control piracy, LimeWire
> charges
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/26/limewire_riaa_counterclaim/
>
> Counterblast in counterclaim
> By Drew Cullen in San Francisco
> Published Tuesday 26th September 2006 22:23
>
> LimeWire LLC has returned fire in its copyright dispute with Recording
> Industry Ass. Of America (RIAA), accusing its members of operating an
> illegal cartel to control the online distribution of music.
>
> In a recent lawsuit, The RIAA attacked LimeWire and its top developers for
> facilitating copyright theft, through its peer-to-peer (P2P) file swapping
> service.
>
> In today's countersuit, Limewire denies the charges, noting that it is
> merely the developer of an open source software. Limewire notes that it
> is a true P2P service - there are no central servers to facilitate file
> exchange. As such, people who download LimeWire swap files entirely of
> their "own volition", it claims. Hmm. We can?t see a US court buying this
> argument.
>
> A much more interesting line of defence is LimeWire's attack against the
> music industry. It says the case is ?part of a much larger conspiracy to
> destroy all innovation that content owners cannot control and that
> disrupts their historical business models?. The RIAA and its members are
> using the law for anti-competitive means, not to control piracy, LimeWire
> charges.
>
> Online music distribution, is it notes, a disruptive business model for
> the music majors, which are "using the exclusivity rights inherent in
> their copyrights - that they deployed with a vengeance, by unlawfully
> extending and pooling those] to cartelize the network for the online
> distribution of music... They also pooled their huge monetary resources to
> combat and eventually defeat many of their online competitors."
>
> LimeWire?s counter-claim is here. ®
> http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filename=arista_limewire_060925answercounterclaim
>
> --
> Michelle Childs -Head of European Affairs
> Consumer Project on Technology in London
> 24, Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX,UK.
> Tel:+44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252.
> Mob:+44(0)790 386 4642. Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607
> http://www.cptech.org
>
> Consumer Project on Technology in Washington, DC
> 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA .Tel.:
> +1.202.332.2670,Fax: +1.202.332.2673
>
> Consumer Project on Technology in Geneva
> 1 Route des Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland
> Tel: +41 22 791 6727
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecommerce mailing list
> Ecommerce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/ecommerce
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|