ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]

  • To: "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'General Assembly of the DNSO'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:15:50 -0400
  • References: <000001c6d783$6cfe71a0$6401a8c0@dnsconundrum>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Michael as I said before, I respect your opinion. And have done so with
others, but do not easily sit still when being condescended to as if someone
from ICANN is doing us a big favor by listening. That is what they are
supposed to be doing. If they came in with that attitude rather than
assuming they know more than everyone else and acting as if every dissenting
opinion is a personal attack, then it might not happen. Respect goes two
ways. They can give some to get some. Ignoring everything that is produced
here as if it were not worth listening to or as if they were doing us some
huge favor by listing is not a show of respect.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'General Assembly of the DNSO'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for
Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]


> Chris,
>
> As I tried to articulate earlier, all it takes is one over the top post
> to undermine a hundred otherwise valid comments. I tried to gently raise
> this issue in connection with a previous post by George where he talked
> about firing all the senior staff at the next Board retreat.
>
> Although I did not always agree with all of my fellow Board directors, I
> generally held most of them in the highest regard.
>
> My first Board meeting was in Tunisia and it lasted all of about 45
> minutes, with the Board reading through resolutions with no discussions
> and unanimous votes. Well in the three years I served on the Board I saw
> much more substantive discussion both during the Board's private and
> public sessions. It was unheard of for directors to file dissenting
> opinions in connection with certain votes.
>
> Now you are free to say that these changes are meaningless, but having
> been on both sides of the fence I can tell you that things are slowly
> changing in the right direction. In the coming weeks the Nominating
> Committee will have the opportunity to continue that change in a
> positive direction. You are free to continue chastising a Board member
> who takes the time and effort to read and respond to this list, or
> perhaps you can try to engage him in an intelligent dialog and get him
> to see a perspective that he/she might not otherwise appreciate.
>
> The choice is yours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Veni Markovski
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:23 PM
> To: kidsearch; Karl Auerbach; Thomas Narten
> Cc: Martin Hannigan; General Assembly of the DNSO
> Subject: Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy
> for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]
>
>
> Thomas,
> welcome to the club!
>
> The moment you respond with something they don't like, they "salute"
> you. As for the people who spend time here - there are different
> options:
>
> a) they really care about the Internet, and spend time in good will
> b) they have some business around domain names, and thus what happens
> around ICANN influences their business a lot
> c) they are members of the ICANN Board or staff, who indeed spend a
> lot of time here, and have no business that depends on ICANN decisions
> d) etc.
>
> Some of these people do not need information from the source. Some of
> them want guidance. Either way, the ICANN people are guilty -
> regardless what the question or contribution is.
>
>
>
> At 02:24 PM 13.9.2006 '?.'  -0400, kidsearch wrote:
> >Oh yes Thomas, we forgot how grateful we should be that you grace us
> >with your presence every time you post. Please allow me this
> >opportunity to say what a wonderful contribution you have made and how
> >much we all appreciate you coming here and spending any of your
> >valuable time with those here who are only on the list to waste the
> >time of such important people like yourself.
> >
> >Thomas people on this list voluntarily spend time on these issues. If
> >you think it is a waste of your time because you don't always hear what
>
> >you want to hear, then may I suggest you build a myspace account and go
>
> >ask people to be your friend.</sarcasm>
> >
> >Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> >
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
>
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/447 - Release Date: 9/13/06
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>