ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ICANN Internationalisation

  • To: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Internationalisation
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SEWoJUkYHLTsaeUD6MRR8EtXvv5TO2KMGSG7iG7s6cAt5d84dvcDKF3HwAO6qBqwnr+f9yBR/EXkxvFckRSf03cMkXjWQ1EU5uPXph1idWUSEiIcazJnvrqc5fz/8YKmXlQD7hke80A0lOLfKPJDfkyr5Zsb6yfr4PbjiNKAeTI= ;
  • In-reply-to: <001901c6d750$d9dc8060$0201a8c0@chris>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  Chris,
   
  You must have read over the first paragraph of the article;  
  "The MoU is the agreement that determines the US government's right to exercise political oversight of ICANN, the organisation that manages the assignment of domain names and IP addresses."
   
  Whoever wrote this, named Lang or something, is very ignorant and probably impaired in some way. How could anyone think ICANN gave the USA Gov. authority instead of the other way around. Management versus Governance is arguable, so we will leave that as a fact that the author plagiarized most the article.
   
  e
         

kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
          Okay this article exposes some really ridiculous stuff about ICANN and the way the board thinks.
   
  http://allafrica.com/stories/200609120904.html 
   
  Really love the last 2 paragraphs.
   
  1. "These same critics believe that either ICANN should be handed over to an international organisation, preferably within the UN framework, or a completely new organisation based on the International Telecommunications Union model should be created. Inné says that ICANN already has an extensive 'international' component because a large number of its directors are not US citizens. She also points out that ICANN is unique in that civil society, business, and governments have significant inputs into its decision making process."
   
  So if you go out and hire a couple of foreign board members you can label yourself internationalised now. In the case many corporations can claim that label. It seems It seems Inne believes ICANN has now fulfilled its obligations to be representative of the entire world.
   
  2. "The California-based ICANN also argues that it does not control, or even manage the Internet - it merely administers the process of assigning numbers to domain names. Inné is currently at Highway Africa as part of her liaison functions with the African region. ICANN has deployed five liaison people around the world as part of an outreach programme to broaden awareness of Internet issues."
   
  So, then ICANN has nothing to do with who gets approved for new TLDs, doesn't review business plans, and doesn't do the other 100 things outside of assigning numbers to domain names. Will someone please tell the board members that we would really like to know what they really do because it seems each board member and staff member has their own interpretation and then the MOU with the DoC has yet another entirely different function established for ICANN that none of them mention at all.
   
  Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
  http://icann.thingsthatjustpissmeoff.com
   


 		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>