<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] New gTLDs to require ICANN scrutiny of Business Plan
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ga] New gTLDs to require ICANN scrutiny of Business Plan
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=T16admd/ZSPoFTUL1PXb+VXwTR1rL9mW0Qdw7LnL6ASiTun9S11MZ48XH49CRuVntWhpFfnw4NR7wU+/fWh1gQ0MWM79zZzYwhp8wSvRwPspHZnxgRiJZ1hagwYMqMY+e8sqXv4H4ETN2YPetolR4X+TkyzvaZZqYvvfjMNG7xI= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It looks like the Amsterdam GNSO session on new gTLDs
has resulted in the conclusion that TLD applicants
must provide a business plan or overview of business
capabilities for ICANN scrutiny.
See the comments by Bruce Tonkin:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-council/msg00191.html
It will be interesting to review the session
transcript to see if the views expressed on this list
were ever considered...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|