<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] The End of Domain Tasting and its Consequences
- To: "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [ga] The End of Domain Tasting and its Consequences
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HQkM6PvsiI/vNGknXeJENBhM+ZSLtIS7+pif4QEVjH40xdhPBHmqzdD0KcKUUmvCxqQh/VyIjJSv0HS5NGAQ20ak2g0POcjBVCPU0Zn/9lPaXsubpvSzKmly7gC6WTl099S3TYPew/+1kkAActOt0OvrRIku3obngtwYomXu0Jw= ;
- In-reply-to: <003201c6c7a4$b9136da0$6401a8c0@dnsconundrum>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mike,
re: "That is why as I stated in my original email the
referral to national competition authorities in the
new registry contracts is so important".
Allow me to point out the following clause: "The
process for the introduction of new Registry Services
shall not apply to such traffic data."
Why, in your view, is the sale of traffic data exempt
from the new Registry Services procedure?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|