Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Veni and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  I do not see any language in Danny's previous post on this thread,
as a violation of RFC 1855 or any reasonable view of "normal
netiquette."
As I am very familiar with RFC 1855, it would seem self evident and
plainly obvious your "Learning" of same is likely/perhaps still in great

need.


Veni Markovski wrote:

> Danny,
> the problem was/is not my view on what you are asking.
>
> The problem is, and it's not overlooking a detail, that there's a
> continuous trend in your e-mails which is not in accordance with the
> normal netiquette. If not the one from RFC 1855, then the one I've
> been learning since September 1990.
>
> Best,
> Veni
>
> At 06:04 PM 02.8.2006 '?.'  -0700, Danny Younger wrote:
> >Hi Veni,
> >
> >I'm sure that you realize that it's sometimes easy to
> >overlook a detail.  I hadn't realized that Jeff had
> >unsubscribed from the list.

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827