<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Google Sued for Allegedly Profiting From Child Porn
Chris and all,
No I wasn't testing you or anyone else at all Chris.
Your rebuttal fails to take into account or consider the central
theme, which is in the subject line as is what the article was actually
talking about, which is; "Google Sued for Allegedly *Profiting* From
Child Porn", not creating it. Ergo also Ford and GM *Profited* from
weak safety regulations, skirting same, and violated other safety
regulations at what they knew before a single vehicle was sold of
same, and were rightly sued accordingly...
Google know full well far in advance that "Child Porn" is bad and
in some instances is a criminal activity, is yet still willing to *Profit* from
it. Hence Google is rightly at least being sued accordingly...
For the record, there are many different kinds of apples, it seems
that perhaps the "Google apple" has the most worms in the search
engine industry... >;) It seems that eradication of at least some of
these Worms from the "Google apple" is necessary or desirable
in order for such an apple to be reasonably publicly palatable...
kidsearch wrote:
> Yes, but they actually had their hands on those things and produced them.
> They have never been successfully sued because a bank robber used their cars
> in a getaway or kidnappers using their vehicles to kidnap, or carjackings
> taking place because their cars are so desirable.
>
> So, you just did an apples and oranges comparison. Google doesn't produce
> the child porn like gm produced the faulty parts.
>
> This legal battle is one google wins easily. Save this email and refer back
> to it later, Jeff.
>
> You were just testing me to see if I'd notice the apples from the oranges
> right Jeff?
>
> Chris McElroy AKA NameCritic
> http://www.ThingsThatJustPissMeOff.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "james tierney"
> <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>; "Kathy Smith" <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "aba isc
> list" <ST-ISC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Greg Abbott" <greg.abbott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Google Sued for Allegedly Profiting From Child Porn
>
> > Chris and all,
> >
> > Wasn't general motors successfully sued for faulty gas tank placement?
> > Wasn't general motors also successfully sued for improper safety designs
> > in the Corvair, a la Ralp Nader?
> > Wasn't Ford also successfully sued for faulty gas tank placement in
> > both ford pinto and more recently for faulty gas tank placement
> > with the ford "Grand V"? I believe so...
> >
> > kidsearch wrote:
> >
> > > Thats like blaming general motors for the kidnapping of a child because
> he
> > > used a chevy van.
> > >
> > > Politician looking to capitalize on publicity being generated by the
> justice
> > > department recently over child porn and a law firm that sues for
> everything
> > > so they can make a buck.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "james tierney" <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>; "Kathy Smith"
> > > <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "aba isc list" <ST-ISC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Greg
> > > Abbott" <greg.abbott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:43 AM
> > > Subject: [ga] Google Sued for Allegedly Profiting From Child Porn
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Google Sued for Allegedly Profiting From Child Porn
> > > > See:
> > > >
> > >
> http://news.com.com/Suit+accuses+Google+of+profiting+from+child+porn/2100-1030_3-6069014.html
> > > >
> > > > One has to wonder and I believe question how DOC/NTIA and
> > > > DOJ can continue to support some members of the ICANN BoD,
> > > > whom are directly involved/employed by Google given this saga
> > > > of miscreant behavior...???
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > > "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> > > > Abraham Lincoln
> > > >
> > > > "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> > > > very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
> > > >
> > > > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > > > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > > > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > > > United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > > > ===============================================================
> > > > Updated 1/26/04
> > > > CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > > > IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> > > > ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> > > > E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Registered Email addr with the USPS
> > > > Contact Number: 214-244-4827
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > "Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> > Abraham Lincoln
> >
> > "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> > very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
> >
> > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > ===============================================================
> > Updated 1/26/04
> > CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> > ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Registered Email addr with the USPS
> > Contact Number: 214-244-4827
> >
> >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|