Re: [ga] Pass through costs

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Funny but the USgov has price fixed for years. The Old Bell Network, ATSF, Steel and copper, grain and corn. But it has always fixed at a lower price than the market would bear. And usually if it is a rize it is for taxes - cigarrettes, gasoline, booze and the like.
   
  I have never seen such a thing where increase in what is essentially  public service goes to a private corp. We still have not seen ICANNs IRS certification of non-profit stratus.
   
  e

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Dr. Dierker, Karl and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

I believe Karl is essentially saying that ICANN with the versign
agreement
recently struck, is engaged in price fixing. Hence Karl's earlier
contention
as well as now godaddy's that this agreement is ripe for antitrust legal

action's...

Registries and registrars, will never be able to sustain profitability
over
the long run on registry and/or domain registration business alone,
hence Dr. Dierker is IMHO correct that value added services
is essential to those registries and registrars if they are to remain
in business...

Hugh Dierker wrote:

> There is no doubt that the consumer will end up paying this bill. I
> hope there will be no price fixing and that the competition will come
> in the form of value added services.
> Registrars and ISPs are not blameless here, as their costs of
> services have been declining i have not seen a lowering fees in
> general.
> Just perhaps we will see an increase in cctld useage.
>
> e
>
> Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > Are the registrars not able to raise their rates in response?
>
> There is no legal reason why they can not raise rates.
>
> However, registrars, unlike registries, are in a competitive
> marketplace
> in which price is, in the minds of many customers, the major
> differentiator. So the registrars are going to end up holding to the
> same
> customer prices and absorbing the increase themselves.
>
> If you take a look at my blog at
> http://www.cavebear.com/cbblog-archives/000239.html you'll see a note
> in
> which I calculate that the real cost of performing a registration at
> the
> registry level is under $0.02 rather than the $6 going to $7+7% price
> that
> ICANN is imposing for .com.
>
> That works out to roughly $5.98 (going to $6.98+) of money that ICANN
> is
> taking out of our pockets each time we register a domain name. When
> multiplied by all the domains in .com that works out to a boatload of
> money every year.
>
> --karl--
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827




		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail
 Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.