Re: [ga] GNSO Meeting -- Washington DC -- Feb. 24/25

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

Is anyone really all that surprised?  I certainly am not given
Merilyn Cade's history regarding such meetings and her
long standing dislike for phone conference meetings...

Danny Younger wrote:

> Milton Mueller has just posted this note to the NCUC
> list:
>
> Based on information supplied to me by our GNSO
> Council members, we learn that the Council is thinking
> of having a physical meeting in late February in
> Washington DC on new gTLDs.
>
> Superficially, it appears that the Council is holding
> this meeting to "make progress on policy drafting" in
> a face to face meeting in order to be ready for the
> Wellington meeting. But take a closer look.
>
> The meeting is also being held to "provide an
> opportunity for any additional public comment on the
> reports published so far." What that means, basically,
> is that it provides an opportunity for
> Washington-based business lobbies (i.e., intellectual
> property and BC) to come in and lobby the proceedings
> in force. And it puts the whole thing before a US
> government audience, just so we know who really calls
> the shots.
> Naturally, the meeting was proposed by Marilyn Cade,
> who has altruistically volunteered to take charge of
> the arrangements.
>
> There is really no excuse for this.
>
> I urge our Council members to start raising tough
> questions about the alleged purpose of this proposed
> meeting.
>
> Holding this meeting in Washington and accepting
> "public comment" turns this into a lobbying meeting
> that will easily be dominated by Washington insiders,
> the BC, IPC and incumbent registries, all of whom have
> good reasons to be hostile to new gTLDs. This is a
> transparent political ploy. What does this say to the
> people in Asia, Africa and Latin America and even
> Europe, that when the Council has to make a crucial
> decision it sets up shop in Washington with a month's
> notice and opens its doors to lobbyists?
>
> If the Council really needs to have a f2f meeting to
> help it work out a common position, its members should
> get together as far away from Washington DC as
> possible, and they should keep ALL lobbying and
> pressure from interest groups as far away from them as
> possible!!!
>
> We have heard the same arguments for and against new
> gTLDs for years. We don't need more comment and
> lobbying. We need to make decisions. The idea that the
> council and its constituencies don't know what their
> position is, or need to hear more, is ridiculous. What
> needs to happen is for the various constituencies to
> put their heads together and come up with a common
> position.
>
> End message.
>
> >From Danny:  If any of you can attend the DC session,
> please write to me off-list
> (dannyyounger[at]yahoo.com) and we will coordinate our
> activities and/or travel arrangements.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827