<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] sedo proposal for one letter domains
- To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] sedo proposal for one letter domains
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:46:09 -0500
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20060126174308.03072850@mail.terabytz.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think I just heard Pinky ask Vint, "What are we gonna do next brain?"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] sedo proposal for one letter domains
> At 10:40 a.m. 26/01/2006, you wrote:
>
><http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_v
iew&newsId=20060125005469&newsLang=en>http://home.businesswire.com/portal/si
te/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20060125005469&newsLang=en
> >
>
> Sedo (a company active in the secondary market for domain Names) assumes
> here that ICANN "owns" the single letters of the Latin alphabet under .com
> (and by implication under other TLD's as well).
> Only an owner (or a secured creditor or the government) has a right to
sell
> property by auction.
>
> Does ICANN now "own" the restricted second levels as a result of it's
> restrictions?
>
>
> -joop-
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|