<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: [governance] Establishment of the European Regional At-Large Organizaton
- To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [governance] Establishment of the European Regional At-Large Organizaton
- From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:29:54 +1300
- Cc: Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, patrick@xxxxxxx, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <43D2758D.5000702@bertola.eu.org>
- References: <ACADB74FBBEFD94795A03FDBBDE62D3735A90C@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de> <ACADB74FBBEFD94795A03FDBBDE62D3735A90C@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 06:55 a.m. 22/01/2006, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
Wolfgang Kleinwächter ha scritto:
The proposed statues would have allowed that one third of members
from a EU-RALO Board would have come from individuals,
Just to let you know that we are in agreement, if you read the proposed
structure for the EURALO, you will discover that up to half of its council
will be composed by representatives of individual members. That is even
more than what was being discussed in Milan, and reflects the common
understanding that there must be a role for active individuals.
--
I agree that it reflects a kind of concession. :-/
The question: is it enough to attract individuals of proud integrity and
independence?
If not, could you raise this percentage to above 50%?
-joop-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|