Re: [ga] truth in domains law
At 12:25 p.m. 29/12/2005, kidsearch wrote:
It is a strange law, a feel-good measure to erect one more minute and ineffective barrier for the protection of minors from pornography. From the text of the law it is not clear whether "misleading" is only the profiting from typos in the names for popular sites as in the case that went to court, or also names like candy-store.com or humpty-dumpty.com If a "misleading DN", [say one such as finance.yahhoo.com] points to any other kind of site with objectionable content such as scams or frauds, political falsities, hate promulgation or bombmaking, it appears not to be covered by this law, in spite of the broad title. It would need different kind of laws to corral content into chartered TLD's.
www.icannatlarge.com
|