ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Revised PDP Deadline

  • To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Revised PDP Deadline
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:38:55 -0500
  • References: <20051221202952.32429.qmail@web53511.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

dejavu. When we had the wg for recomendations to the names council, they did
it right when the holidays would interfere as well. We chose to extend it in
spite of them.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: [ga] Revised PDP Deadline


> From Avri Doria to the cpsr governance list:
>
> "the GNSO council just decided to extend the deadline
> further until the end of January to allow for more
> extensive commenting.  they will be putting out a call
> for paper contributions on the substantive issues.
> There will also be some on line consultations (form to
> be decided yet) on these issue papers.  formal
> announcement etc should be out in the next days."
>
> Note from Danny:
>
> The deadline extension was requested by Marilyn Cade
> who wrote:
>
> "1) Given that we are losing about two weeks due to
> holiday, I
> propose that Council formally announce an extension in
> the initial comment process to extend it to the end of
> January. This would give more time to the Constituency
> statements, and also allow the following process to
> take place for more input into the policy development
> process.
> 2) I propose that Council direct the staff director,
> Olof Nordling, to manage a process on behalf of
> Council that would be structured consultation and
> input into the process.
> All of our constituencies and the broader community
> could undoubtedly benefit from the opportunity to hear
> from experts, rather than just gather opinions or make
> statements.
>         Again, I am proposing that we also recognize
> that the PDP time frames do not work, especially
> taking into account the holiday period and we formally
> extend the time frame now for the preparation of the
> initial submission of information to the Staff
> Manager.
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg01685.html
>
> I would choose to argue with Marilyn that PDP time
> frames do work just fine if you're inclined to
> actually get some work done.
>
> I thank the members of the GA for having adhered to
> the Board-established timeline without any qualms.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>