ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] politicisation of the internet

  • To: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, RBHauptman@xxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] politicisation of the internet
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:36:10 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kKUkNCCBuaMR19rhRFjSLl3htAOGy67GGbTerfMiElF0vUpiVDZEczoNu+sA7lc2w2/6CHgGDvHasRR7DlSZCtLeCuD4V4RDHLgjP8A4FeEI5HVdg7ML/7r7nVc7ACRs2zlp3Lyey2HdaPu4bJd1CiaN2f8O82x2VUI/vJrk5Rk= ;
  • In-reply-to: <000c01c60032$1a0c0d00$0201a8c0@kidsearch4>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would appreciate one smart individual showing me five incidents where the USA Gov. interfered with an ICANN contract and or policy.
   
  1.
  2.
  3.
  4.
  5.
   
  I will even allow for going back 3 years. So something more than once a year.
  Good luck.
  e

kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
          I agree with you that the US gov. doesn't want to give up control. I'm just saying that rather than add more governments I'd like to see us move toward an international org running the Internet with individual user representation without gov. interference. It can be done. I don't think it's irrational at all.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: RBHauptman@xxxxxxx 
  To: kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] politicisation of the internet
  

       but there IS government control of the Internet.  the USA government.  And from what I've read here for a number of years, the USA government is NOT about to give up it's total and unequivocal CONTROL of the Internet.
   
  So, it makes perfect sense that OTHER governments want to change that.  rationale. logical. reasonable.
   
  Your wish for NO government control isn't rationale. It may be lofty, heck I agree with you.  But given the USA government is NOT going to do that.  It just won't.  It is recalcitrant.  
   
  kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
  I'll take door number 3 monty. No government control of the internet.
  
   
  


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>