Re: [ga] Re: On new TLDs/The poor poor man

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You are right in that they could set up a system. However no rule at all
means they don't even have to do that. I'm for making the manipulation of
the process more difficult. I'm not deluded that we can solve all problems.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "Danny Younger"
<dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: On new TLDs/The poor poor man


>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, kidsearch wrote:
>
> > What I am talking about is that we put a limit on the number of tlds one
> > comapny can offer or manage or whatever.
>
> It can be very difficult to identify "one company".  It is quite easy, and
> relatively inexpensive, to create a constellation of corporations to act
> as TLD-owning strawman.
>
> If you want to dredge into chains of ownership and control you are going
> to have to create a substantial investigative arm and add a of cost and
> delay and room for wiggling and disputes.
>
> Again - we ought not to try to solve *all* problems else we won't solve
> *any*.
>
>   --karl--
>