ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] At-Large Comment Opposing new TLDs

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] At-Large Comment Opposing new TLDs
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 12:33:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4F/QrYgHfvux17RDwS3XpF0i4Z8tG2grGAS9kaWUJI43BY5JDFPSX92+q9KIrlz9UZZKF96sTk+ZGCiH5pkL19ogV5gXMMqk28Rjs24HUX2wOYc+YFClFZYzgrgOlC5lqZYkb09j6FddLUYAqfUbjcA5X4jfF9OmUrb93pNM2/M= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Randy Glass, America-At-Large writes:

"This will be my 4th time mentioning in
public the simple fact of which I'll continue to
mention until someone hears it: get the existing
structure solidified before making further
progression.  In other words, I really can't fathom a
need for more TLDs of any type - right now.  What
about in 2525? Well, there obviously may be a valid
need, maybe not.  Currently, we are building a
structure without solid foundations.  (exhibit B:
Michael D. Palage's post- "Registry Failure White
Paper" -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/new-gtld-questions/msg00010.html)

I humbly wonder how it is possible that by introducing
more TLDs would create a more stable environment. 
While I personally envision ICANN as a 'facilitator,'
I don't see how adding confusion to the network helps
to facilitate."  
http://forum.icann.org/lists/new-gtld-questions/msg00013.html


		
__________________________________________ 
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>