ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Individual Users Constituency

  • To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Individual Users Constituency
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:37:00 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FoxY/zSSiYKQ7aPokwQOgBULcJSILJmI1PodTeiH0YsY+Hi02IL4cwvzrdDaw7H59SC6VnZyxBvO9cU5Z65zPcWz2wrfiAH0qsHaYZQPJ0lWcmDvu9vG+Fi2JAtuPoY4TlIldmWXljYu8OI4gqzDCZMia6d4ZPqJC6p/9W/BauU= ;
  • In-reply-to: <047d01c5f7ad$711854b0$c934fd3e@richard>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree with Richard regarding the need for an
Individual Users Constituency within the GNSO.  The
GNSO has not addressed a number of issues that
continue to concern me as an individual registrant. 
One of my ongoing worries pertains to the failure of
ICANN to enforce the registrar data escrow provisions
contained in the RRA -- our domain names remain at
risk, and no one in the GNSO is acting in defense of
our interests.  We must take the initiative and
establish our own constituency so that such security
concerns and other matters of importance to individual
users will be properly addressed. 



--- Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Karl on ALAC: "It's time to pull the plug. It's been
> a pathetic failure. The Byzantine structure renders
> the voice of the individual user useless. individual
> users have been kept out in the cold for far too
> long. the ALAC should be replaced."
> 
> 
> 
> I agree.
> 
> 
> 
> I believe an Individual Users Constituency,
> operating within the GNSO, based on individuals not
> institutions, would be more productive.
> 
> 
> 
> Yrs,
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Henderson
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>