<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] ICANN Staff Shenanigans
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ga] ICANN Staff Shenanigans
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:15:42 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hGzSek/8YZn5JzQ6w3+t2X+aBv2HPEleG/N/vRZqg8smjBbG+/xM9uUR9CNIRC23X15rUBWOKtFaRQ+lZ+glixcN7P21xCUqIdan2kE0R3khdSKKIxZceJsotGtuHuTdrSVSKAMTSS/a7BeUrgCjdqr59BQbFnmW9lCdkVwdnII= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ross Rader writes:
"At the same time, I?ve been told privately that ICANN
staff are making it difficult for those that don?t
support the proposed Verisign settlement agreement to
use the ICANN meeting in Vancouver as a platform.
Apparently ICANN staff involved in planning the
meeting aren?t too keen on give a booth to a coalition
lobbying against the agreement unless the coalition
provides ICANN staff with a list of members.
Sounds like a precursor to an inquisition if you ask
me.
Why is the ICANN staff so intent on making it
impossible for its supporters to stay supporters? It
seems that as every day goes by, they are
strengthening the case for moving DNS oversight to a
multinational organization."
http://code.byte.org/blog/_archives/2005/11/15/1406564.html
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|