Re: [ga] DNS Détente

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Danny,
 
I cannot speak on behalf of, however i can guarantee you, that there is one nation in Southeast Asia that would never submit to this, on the exact basis of sovereignty. I feel 99% sure that one south of me in North America would not allow such thought much less action.
However most international treaty work in this type of veto area really says that if you don't do it we will start sanctioning you.  ie no business, no service, we tax your stuff etc. etc.
It is more like being a member of the club, if you do not follow the rules you cannot be a member and therefor you cannot enjoy the perks.
That concept seems to be palatable to Socialists and Capitalists alike.
 
e 

Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike,

I read with interest that proposal that you and Tricia
Drake co-authored at
http://www.circleid.com/posts/internet_governance_countdown_to_tunis/

My question pertains to the point below:

19. In the case where a Government Contact for the
ccTLD in question sought to veto the recommended
actions of IANA, the GRSSSC would have the ability to
override the Government Contact veto and authorize the
implementation of the original IANA recommendation.

Could you perhaps comment on the sovereignty
implications? In your view, is it likely that nation
states will agree with the proposition that a
supra-national body (the GRSSSC) may exercise an
authority to override the actions of their own ccTLD's
governmental contact?

Also, I would anticipate that your joint proposal
would be submitted to both the ccNSO and groups such
as CENTR for review... but do these bodies currently
have a mechanism for public intake?

regards,
Danny





__________________________________ 
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com


		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.