<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] A Monroe Doctrine for the Internet
For all.
When you want to express something about United States, please say:
US, USA, United States, or something like that.
When you want to express something about all America: (Latin America,
Caribbean Area, North America), please express: America, Americas.
Monroe maybe was one of the biggest problem in the development of a
real latinamerican area, Monroe express: America for the Americans,
but some people (in special in USA) understand America for the USA.
So, please, almost in this "international space of dialogue", express
correctly.
And only for put some ideas in the discuss, some year ago, a
latinamerican proposal for try to help in the academic discuss about
what doing with the cyberspace appear in 2001. This project called:
"The Internationalization of Cyberspace for a Legal E-Qual World: A
Latin American Initiative" (http://www.alfa-redi.com/gic/
Well.
see you.
Erick
At 11:51 a.m. 06/11/2005, Hugh Dierker wrote:
Perhaps i do not know what arrogance means but, i do not believe in means;
Giving more aid to other countries than the rest of the world combined.
Transferring the "control" of the internet from government to a
quasi-public entity.
Throwing the full weight of the Pac Fleet into rescue efforts after a Tsunami.
Obtaining the right to vote and go to school for "gazillions" of
women for the first time in known history.
WWII comes to mind as something not arrogant, as my Dierker
ancestors, gassed or luckily saved would know.
But back to the internet Mr. Hauptman, you criticize but what is
your alternative plan on behalf of your "bazillion" California constituents?
As for Countries you should have noticed while reciting the wars in
Iraq and Afghan that you were writing in line with an Englishman,
whos country is one hundred percent allied with "America" in such
endeavors and who's trade treaties together help form the basis for
the global communications networks that make this net and ecommerce
work globally.
Which was following a line by a good Frenchman Jefsey who basically
has always held we should work within the existing structure while
perfecting alternatives internationally. And he sat on the GAC.
Read some ICANN history and see just how captured the workings are
by US interests. Chairman of the board is a good place to start.
Chau,
Eric
RBHauptman@xxxxxxx wrote:
I've been an American all my life. And I can say without
qualification that we are arrogant, self-centered, and think the
world revolves around us. That's why we are as hated as we are
loved. Our passion and zeal to impose everything on everyone makes
my skin crawl. And it's how we get into all these problems (killing
a gazillion Iraqis and Afghanis among them). We are Right and you
are Wrong. It's a pretty simple equation for those who are
Simple. And arrogant.
Rick
richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Danny, are you American? Go figure...
But seriously, I am willing to see a continuing use of ICANN (with some
desired reforms) but there is no logic to the idea that ICANN has to have
just one "current steward" - the US.
Danny, I am not American. I do not think that the rest of the world should
be satisfied with ICANN being accountable only to *your* country.
Whatever makes Americans think that that's OK?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> As for me, while I can find some reasons for
> dissatisfaction with the current administration of the
> root, I cannot find a sufficient number of convincing
> reasons to delegate the stewardship of th! e root to an
> entity other than its current steward.
<http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTFqODRtdXQ4BF9TAzMyOTc1MDIEX3MDOTY2ODgxNjkEcG9zAzEEc2VjA21haWwtZm9vdGVyBHNsawNmYw--/SIG=110oav78o/**http%3a//farechase.yahoo.com/>Yahoo!
FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|