Re: [ga] RE: Bylaws Change Requested -- The At-Large Requires Representation

["M. Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16:56 24/10/2005, RBHauptman@xxxxxxx said:
> Looks to me that you are advocating the UN or some other 
> international approach.

I advocate an International solution for the International Network 
system loaded on my machines. I am my boss home. Not GWB, not UN, not 
ICANN, not ITU, not GNSO/GA.  If someone threspasses, I take my gun 
if I am in a wild area or I go for the police and Gov if I am in a 
more developped place.

Pretty common. Internet is a standard piece of life. I accept no one 
to fool or force me in what to do or to think. How big it is.
Take care.
jfc


> <mailto:jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is what is really discussed at the WSIS, a forum where the users
> can document themselves to themselves. ICANN could have done it. It
> still can share in it. But ICANN (and IETF) by their US nexus have
> difficulty to switch from "AmerICANN" to multiculturalism. The real
> issue is therefore deeper and simpler. We see it with the IDN failure.
> The diagnosis is clear (Peace Nobel Price):
> http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/10/06/64579.html
> The WSIS just tries to prevent us from the Internet bleak society.
> The root of the problem is not the DNS root, but RFC 1766, 3066, etc.
> which confuse internationalisation (all the computers to speak an
> underlaying English) and multiculturalization (the e-communications
> empowerment of the persons' communities).
> The decision is not at the WSIS, ICANN/GNSO/GA, etc. but it is to
> know if Google, Yahoo!, Verisign will understand their business
> interest as services providers (with 70% of non-English speakers).
> The future board of Unicode will be the real indication. And how the
> IANA will transform.