Re: [ga] Re: .pro not resolving

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephane and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Here again is yet another example of poor decision making on the
part of the ICANN BoD and staff for "Giving" or "Selling" stakeholders
out for a buck or two in fees.  Typical for ICANN of course...
And so the saga continues...

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:10:39PM +0200,
>  Marcus Gilmore <marcusgilmore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
>  a message of 67 lines which said:
>
> > Some domains has started working again and their status has changed
> > back from "inactive" to "ok".
>
> Yes, "newswire.pro", for instance, which was "inactive" is now
> back. And, although the serial number of the zone did not change,
> there is now a reply (besides "no such domain") from the DNS servers.
>
> Someone at Registry Pro forgot that "UPDATE Domains SET
> status='inactive'" should be followed by a WHERE clause :-)

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827