ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Is it true?

  • To: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Is it true?
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 21:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=NA3sK446Njzw2uIXHvU3q/t6cmfKeA4rNrp9q7SdXjClFTHCOrxujyvXf6yvChOMDhUn1TV2nVYeDWBUHvODP6kZ1oyg+4NyR3Fy84cfwTKZG8YXEn17O8lYsKMGcNpOedn80NczW0ZVhMkD8u9DsM88pcwL7DF3GgbU/rYSIwU= ;
  • In-reply-to: <428FC3D0.5070206@hermesnetwork.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I never did figure that one out Sotiris,
 
Please enlighten me as to why the registrars did not argue for that point of "pay for the information". Everyone else does it and in fact the IP interests farm it out for leads for sales telemarketing.
Was there some tit for tat I missed along the way?
Certainly Richard is right, and one way to curb abuse is to charge for the information and have to give your own to get it. Easy and routinely in play, why not here?
 
e 

Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard Henderson wrote:

> What compelling reason can anyone at ICANN offer for insisting that a 
> registrant's home address, phone number etc should be made available to 
> the rest of the world?

Richard et al.,

Well, at ICANN Montreal I had a chat with an IP lawyer from the UK 
who maintained that it made her job easier and I agreed... I 
further observed to her that it allowed her to maximize profit by 
providing her with *free* access to what really should be privileged 
information. Of course, she didn't like that part...

Now, if I were a registrar looking for another revenue stream, I 
would be lobbying to make WHOIS information restricted so that I 
could sell WHOIS queries to IP lawyers and others... So, whatever 
happens, I won't be surprised by anything at this point. (sigh)

Sincerely,

Sotiris


-- 
This email includes a valid digital signature which positively 
distinguishes the sender and serves to ensure that the message has 
not been altered since it was sent. For more information on having 
your identity validated for use in your own Personal Certificate 
visit the THAWTE Web of Trust (WOT): 
https://www.thawte.com/wot/index.html

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender 
does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, 
use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by 
other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received 
this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or 
otherwise) immediately.
begin:vcard
fn:Sotiris Sotiropoulos
n:Sotiropoulos;Sotiris
email;internet:sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel;work:416.422.1034
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>