<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] At Large meetings in Mar del Plata
- To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] At Large meetings in Mar del Plata
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=2q6D8DMszumlb68AiLDyXoA0gWgC0P1p7igSrjELE8Qg11R01OQBzp/PGrIIdQcDtbMVelertaRIySOKptrne6oWjDkSd/CekNMi8a/BK+tZGEW7rviZzpQXYqmVJF4cQn3/GgHkQcX1kP5aZWwMtwF+69MpdIYOk+MyRFENwbk= ;
- In-reply-to: 6667
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Why doesn't someone head up and lead an outside ICANN at-large and then afterwards allow ICANN to ask it to join? Is it because engineers and marketeers, which form the base of interested individuals, just cannot lower their egos long enough to be led? They impossibly attempt consensus but seem too self important to allow another accalades enough to accept a leader. And any thing close gets bought by promises by ICANN. Internet players are too weak I have seen to compromise and allow there to be such a site as you suggest you have.
This is why ICANN can do whatever the hell they want. Joke or not they are more cohesive than any other group. (save Jeffs' which refuses to be open and transparent).
It is easier here to criticize than to form consensus. Fun to watch and be a part of though.
e
Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 06:51 a.m. 4/04/2005, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>* At-Large website (w/ICANN staff) and public access
Why not just point to a real At Large web site such as
www.icannatlarge.com
Public access to its fora will be maintained there; that is the main
purpose of its continued existence.
--Joop--
www.icannatlarge.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|