Re: [ga] Michael Palage

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  I also don't think Eric should have been engaged in name calling.
But Michael, I also think he was trying to get you to be a bit more
direct, straight forward, and timely in answering questions you were
ask. And I believe to be fair, Eric D. usually offers solutions as well
as wisdom in his remarks, even if I or you do not agree with some
of his remarks/comments/proposals.  So what!?  Cannot reasonable
people disagree and do so intensely and/or strongly?  If not, why not?
Eric is as much a part of any solution as a spakeholder/user, as
you are Michael.  How could he be otherwise, as your remarks
suggest?

  I am glad that you are preparing answers to danny's questions. I hope
you will also be answering mine.

  I disagree with your opinion of Vittorio and/or Erick as having
any constructive product in much of their efforts/rhetorical remarks
as well as in very few proposals. As such Danny calling for their
resignation was appropriate.  In fact, Vittorio's history and his own
blog would tend to indicate your opinion, for whatever reason it is
motivated, is incorrect.  Erick whom has repeatedly refused to
recognize English as the internationally recognized language, in doing
so, demonstrates a lack of living in the real world.  That in and of
itself
is troubling...

  There is no such thing as "Rule" on a ML forum. As a lawyer
you should know that.  I believe actually you do, but my belief
is only based on instinct in this particular instance and/or
occurrence...

Michael D. Palage wrote:

>    Hugh:
>
> I like the phrase that "you are either part of the problem or part of
> the
> solution. " Obviously in your eyes I am part of the problem, so I will
> not
> even bother asking. However, I was wondering if you can elaborate on
> how you
> are part of the solution. Specifically, how have your diatribes helped
> in
> bringing people into the ICANN process or making it better. I readily
> admit
> that the ICANN process is not perfect, but I believe that the efforts
> of
> Erick, Vittorio and others should be acknowledged not condemned.
>
> Unfortunately the GA list has evolved into a three person sand box
> where
> you, Danny and Jeff Williams rule. The only reason I remain subscribed
> to
> the list is to hear the regular/occasional useful insight of Danny,
> Richard,
> Karl, and Sotiris. Although I am not always in agreement with what
> they have
> to say, I generally find what they have to say a useful contribution
> to the
> marketplace of ideas.
>
> I never liked bullies, and unfortunately you are nothing more than a
> verbal
> bully that seeks to keep people from playing in your little DNS
> sandbox. Are
> you proud of yourself regarding this accomplishment?
>
> Michael D. Palage
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827