ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Strong Arm Tactics

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Strong Arm Tactics
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:43:43 -0800
  • Cc: mike@xxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <20050304191246.26571.qmail@web53508.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny, Mike and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Mike, I also am and have been for some time as you know not supportive

this sort of strong arm coercion  funding method.  It is unnecessary,
hurtful,
not ethical, and as Danny here indicates as I have in speaking for our
members, as well as has Karl, Eric, and a host of other long time
participants, not in keeping with a non-profit organization..  It simply

promotes ill will.  Such is not wise...

Danny Younger wrote:

>    Mike,
>
> Your candidate statement refers to "the 75 cent fee incorporated into
> the .NET RFP".  I hope you don't mind discussing this issue...
>
> As I recall, ICANN's MOU (under the PROHIBITIONS section) states:
> "Neither Party, either in the DNS Project or in any act related to the
> DNS Project, shall act unjustifiably or arbitrarily to injure
> particular persons or entities or particular categories of persons or
> entities."
>
> If one gTLD registry is being charged this fee and others are not, why
> wouldn't this be considered an arbitrary act that unjustifiably and
> financially injures this one particular entity?  Why should the .net
> registry have to pay more in fees than the other gTLD registries?
>
> Just because the .NET RFP coerces applicants into accepting the 75
> cent fee doesn't make it right.  To me, it seems like nothing more
> than blatant strong-arm tactics at play.
>
> What is your view?

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>