ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Best laid plans

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Best laid plans
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Icannwatch has disclosed an hilarious fact. I is every lawyer brief writers' worst nightmare; he forgot to shephardize or update to the most current cases.
http://www.icannwatch.org/
 
On the otherhand it is sloppy and unprofessional and a total disgrace and lack of respect for oneself. But on the third hand wouldn't it be hilarious if Wilson was wrong.
 
"ICANNfocus Article on ASO MoU Compares Wrong Documents
posted by Mueller on Thursday October 28 2004, @08:05PM 

Paul Wilson writes "Before anyone else jumps on this particular bandwagon:

      http://thecre.com/icann/20041025_mou.htm

please understand that ICANNfocus has reached its conclusions by comparing the wrong documents. The new ASO MoU is available at:

      http://www.nro.net
      http://www.aso.icann.org

Comment and criticism are welcome as always, but please make sure you are critiquing the right document!



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>