Re: [ga] ICANN Budget Update/Must be an error

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

The last I checked ICANN was still a not for profit org. If that be the case some lawyer has really opened up a can of worms with the wording of the fee for services concept as layed out below. If some hotshot suggests that there is no liability for charging for a profit in a not for profit, they are outright not being honest.
I strongly urge all responsible to seek second opines on this matter.
Eric 

GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; ga[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]


ICANN's Adopted Fiscal Year 2004?2005 Budget
http://www.icann.org/financials/budget-fy04-05-06oct04.html

POSTED 22 September 2004,
has been UPDATED 6 October 2004*

with an jnserted new section: "Invoicing of Transaction-Based gTLD Fees"
http://www.icann.org/financials/budget-fy04-05-06oct04.html#invoicing


--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!