Re: [ga] Latest on dotIQ - Posted 6/3/2004 10:51 PM Updated 6/4/2004 12:00 AM

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

It would seem to me that if France and the US can openly argue about the process and methods used in establishing a self determined Iraq. And through these open and frank discussions come to an agreement that is approved unanamously by the UN. And believe me there was public input. Voters and all. 
Then it should be, especially when a recognized group within Iraq asked for it, a very speedy and open process to establish dotIQ.  But it must be an open process for the protection of the Iraqi users. Adjustments can be made, awareness brought to the attention of dotcommoners, and learned folks can offer insights, warn of hazards and suggest alternative such as provisional delegation subject to review.
Eric

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

I would tend to agree with your evaluation of ICANN's display in it's
lack
to be open and Transparent as well as communicating well. Nothing new
in this sort of displayed attitude from ICANN. It may be that the ICANN

Board prefers a party outside of Iraq to manage dotIQ. But we don't
know that for sure, yet some prior indications from Asaad would indicate

that.

> This is total bullshit, ICANN makes no comment and accepts no
> comment. What a bunch of incompetent idiots. "Open and Transparent"
> equals "no comment".
> Eric
>
> "The ICANN general counsel handling the Iraq application did not
> return a message. A spokesman said the organization does not comment
> on applications."
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:All former DNSO GA
> members or other interested stakeholders/users,
>
> See:http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-06-03-iraqnet_x.htm
>
> Seems Asaad was a bit mistaken as I had thought.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
>
> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> Pierre Abelard
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
>
>

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger