<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Public Comments on the Draft Procedure for Designating Subsequent .net Registry Operator
- To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Public Comments on the Draft Procedure for Designating Subsequent .net Registry Operator
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <NNEDIOPEMBHEFLDDKOMJOEAFDJAA.gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is a very well done professional link. Why is it that for matters of substance and public input you simply cannot get through to the links which effect tens of thousands and yet for junkets that effect tens of people it is perfect? Is this a matter of conceipt and and corruption? Overspending on perks and no money to maintain links and a website and archives. And EU is supposed to kick in for this fiasco?
eric
GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org]
Public Comments are invited on the Draft Procedure for Designating
Subsequent .net Registry Operator
View the document:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-02jun04.htm
Draft Procedure for Designating Subsequent .net Registry Operator
Please send comments to:
dotnet-comments@xxxxxxxxx
Comment archives at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/dotnet-comments/
GNSO Secretariat
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|