Re: [ga] This Forum virus hits form one subscriber - Causes...

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John,

  I was born standing up and talking back John...  Sorry if that
upsets you..  Live with it guy!  >;)  And I am sorry you feel
a need to resort to foul language as well.  That indeed is a shame...:/

John Palmer wrote:

> Fuck you Jeff - tell me - were you born an asshole or did your mother
> teach you how to be one?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Leah G" <jandl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 4:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] This Forum virus hits form one subscriber - Causes...
>
> > Leah and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
> >
> >   Oh? Well than why did you twice inform us all that you did?  Oh yes
> > and BTW I did not say you were using Norton Firewall..   And
> > BTW as well the info I provided included  "Symantec Norton AntiSpam
> > 2004"  So, why was it that your Email address was several times carrying
> > a attached file that contained a virus, even after it was several times
> > pointed out your Email address, and not spoofed as you claimed, was
> > still sending out a virus in an attached file?
> >
> >   Now I can believe that VERY recently you  have changed or added
> > additional virus protect software as you state below...  But that's after
> > some time after the fact Leah...  Too much time after the fact...
> >
> >   The proof as you well know Leah is in the archives.  I have no
> > problem what so ever providing that proof in a court of proper
> > jurisdiction ANY TIME!  I await your service...
> >
> > Leah G wrote:
> >
> > > Can it Jeff.  I don't use Norton Firewall or Norton Internet Security.
> > > I use Norton AV, Trend Micro online and others for virus scanning.  My
> > > firewall is a double - Zone Alarm Pro and a linux firewall.  In
> > > addition, I keep track of vulnerabilities in all software I use and
> > > update regularly.  I'm probably in the minority in terms of keeping up
> > > with security alerts.  Most people do not.
> > >
> > > I'm really sick of this, Jeff.  Some infected machine has my email
> > > address and it is being spoofed.  If you can't check headers and realize
> > > that, I'm sorry, but continuing to insist that I have an infected
> > > machine or that my machine is the source of the viruses sent to this
> > > list is something you need to RETRACT unless you can prove it - and you
> > > can't because it is untrue.  Now I'm angry.
> > >
> > > Leah
> > >
> > > Jeff Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > All former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
> > > >
> > > >   Lately or recently this forum has been hit by Leah's Email address
> > > > containing viruses.  The cause seems to be from the following,
> > > > given Leah's several self proclaimed use of Norton.
> > > > See ( fixes now avalible, below.  Note: switch to some other
> > > > vendors virus ware Leah )
> > > >
> > > > ======================
> > > >
> > > >  HIGH: Symantec Firewall Products Multiple Vulnerabilities
> > > > Affected:
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security 2002
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security 2003
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security 2004
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security Professional 2002
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security Professional 2003
> > > > Symantec Norton Internet Security Professional 2004
> > > > Symantec Norton Personal Firewall 2002
> > > > Symantec Norton Personal Firewall 2003
> > > > Symantec Norton Personal Firewall 2004
> > > > Symantec Client Firewall 5.01, 5.1.1
> > > > Symantec Client Security 1.0, 1.1, 2.0(SCF 7.1)
> > > > Symantec Norton AntiSpam 2004
> > > >
> > > > Description: Symantec firewall products, used by both enterprises and
> > > > home users, contain the following vulnerabilities in the "SYMDNS.SYS"
> > > > module. This module validates the DNS and NetBIOS name service
> > > > responses before allowing them to pass through the firewall.
> > > >
> > > > (1) The module contains a stack-based buffer overflow that can be
> > > > triggered by a DNS response with an overlong "CNAME" field. The
> > > > overflow can be exploited to execute arbitrary code with the
> > > > "KERNEL" privileges.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the firewall processes all DNS response packets i.e. any UDP
> > > > packet with source port 53. Hence, the flaw lends itself to easy
> > > > exploitation via spoofed UDP packets.
> > > >
> > > > (2) The module contains another stack-based buffer overflow that can be
> > > > triggered by a specially crafted NetBIOS response with an overlong
> > > > NetBIOS name. The overflow can be exploited to execute arbitrary code
> > > > with the "KERNEL" privileges. Note that if the client allows Windows
> > > > file sharing, the NetBIOS name service port 137/udp is open.
> > > >
> > > > (3) The module contains a heap-based buffer overflow that can be
> > > > triggered by a crafted NetBIOS response. The problem arises when the
> > > > NetBIOS response does not contain the "Type", "Class", "Time-to-Live"
> > > > and "Data Length" fields in a "Resource Record". The heap-based
> > > > overflow can be leveraged to execute arbitrary code with "KERNEL"
> > > > privileges, but is believed to be difficult to exploit reliably.
> > > >
> > > > (4) The module contains a denial-of-service vulnerability. The problem
> > > > arises because a malicious domain name, constructed by using the DNS
> > > > "compressed name pointer", can cause the decoding routine to enter an
> > > > "infinite" loop. A hard reboot is required to restore the system to
> > > > normalcy. The technical details required to exploit all the
> > > > vulnerabilities have been posted.
> > > >
> > > > Status: Symantec has confirmed the flaws; updates available. Clients
> > > > are advised to use the "LiveUpdate" feature to get the latest fixes.
> > > >
> > > > Council Site Actions:  Three of the reporting council sites are using
> > > > the affected product.  One site has already patched their systems via
> > > > the LiveUpdate Feature.  Another site has only notified their sysadmins
> > > > and has not yet planned how to remediate. They are expecting a major
> > > > effort since they were hit hard by the recent BlackIce attack.  The
> > > > third site has a large number of Symantec users; however they do not
> > > > officially support the software and do not plan any action at this time.
> > > >
> > > > They said that if there is an exploit released in the wild, they will
> > > > inform the end users who have signed up for general security
> > > > notifications.
> > > >
> > > > References:
> > > > eEye Advisories
> > > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20040512D.html (DNS
> > > > Overflow)
> > > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20040512A.html (NetBIOS
> > > > Stack Overflow)
> > > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20040512C.html (NetBIOS
> > > > Heap Overflow)
> > > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20040512B.html (DNS DoS)
> > > > Symantec Advisory
> > > > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2004.05.12.html
> > > >
> > > > DNS DoS Exploit
> > > > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-05/0131.html
> > > > SecurityFocus BID
> > > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10333
> > > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10334
> > > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10335
> > > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10336
> > > > ****************************************************************
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > > > "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> > > >     Pierre Abelard
> > > >
> > > > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > > > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > > > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > > > United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > > > ===============================================================
> > > > Updated 1/26/04
> > > > CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > > > IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> > > > E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >  Registered Email addr with the USPS
> > > > Contact Number: 214-244-4827
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Leah G.
> > > http://forums.delphiforums.com/atlargeorg
> > > http://forums.delphiforums.com/domainwatch
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> > "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> >     Pierre Abelard
> >
> > "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> > liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> > P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> > United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> > ===============================================================
> > Updated 1/26/04
> > CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> > IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  Registered Email addr with the USPS
> > Contact Number: 214-244-4827
> >
> >
> >
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827