Re: [ga] Google's SafeSearch is overzealous, blocks innocuous domains
- To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Google's SafeSearch is overzealous, blocks innocuous domains
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <408C63B0.C8583471@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alright I admit being a slow study but my wonderful wife keeps me preoccupied at certain intervals.
Yahoo & Google are a kick in the pants. They are so hooked up with other sites that steal and sell your cookies or whatever that it is hillarious. It is a multilevel marketing scheme to beat all hell. I like to think of marketing being education and visa versa. But trickery and chcanery runs rampant with these groups.
Oh slow down and don't get me wrong - I love smart, devious ugly and untransparent abuse of others privacy and ignorance. Heck I own part of the Brooklyn bridge and some Ocean front property in Colorado. I only wish I still had my pet rock and my Edsol.
But there must come a point for reliability, security and stability. Shucks I have been educated by the likes of Jeff, Andy, Joop, Michael, Peter, Judith and Joanna, not to mention Sotiris, Jefsey, Leah and so many others. So I know when I buy a bit of the moon I may not get a title to some of my land. Shoot I know the odds on the lottery and my mother-in-law yells at my father in law for spending so much dong on tickets. But maybe one lire could get me a billion pounds.
However it must be open and transparent to a dotcommoner otherwise it really is fraud and I lower my head and shake it when I see people that know the biz abuse folks that are less fortunate.
Here truly is the need for regulation and coordination.
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Who is setting the standard for the industry?
In the search engine industry, Google is the qusi-standard. That's
what makes this so very troubling..
> I cannot find what some would call an authoritative learned treatise
> on this matter.
Well maybe you can ask Joe Simms or Louis Touton. After all, Joe
is supposedly a self styled "Virus Laden Web page" expert. So I
can only guess he is also an expert of search Engine technology as
And Louis Touton is also supposedly an expert in Internet technology,
of so some have touted him with! In any event my purpose in mentioning
both Joe and Louis is that I have received very recent information from
two independent reliable sources, that ICANN had a hand in this whole
> RFCs are ok. But when it comes down to socio-economic quasi legal
> precedent they fall far short of the adequacy mark. ISO stuff is
> fairly helpful, when community based organizations enact enforcement
> by compliance. UBC type code enforcement works fairly well to avoid
> substandard living and working situations of a hardwire variety.
> I wanted something like reliability, stability and security. But for
> now we seem to be stuck with caveat emptor - buyer beware.
> Jeff Williams wrote:
> Andy and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
> Good point here Andy! And let's also not forget Google's Gmail
> privacy holes of recent concern and note as well..
> Of course Calif. and other states in the US already have legislation
> pending to ban the Gmail service... Will NZ soon follow??
> Andy Gardner wrote:
> > Another domain related problem with Google is that they ban recycled
> > domains (ie deleted and re-registered) from their index, making them
> > useless for ecommerce.
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> Pierre Abelard
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs