<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: The battle over .xxx again...
- To: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: The battle over .xxx again...
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:34:52 +0100
- In-reply-to: <406118B5.E30B174F@ix.netcom.com>
- Organization: NIC France
- References: <406118B5.E30B174F@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:12:22PM -0800,
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 32 lines which said:
> Seems to me in the .xxx specific case, depending on how it is
> handled, it would be a good idea to have such a sTLD.
Read RFC 3675 ".sex Considered Dangerous" first.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|