<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Verisign vs ICANN Sitefinder update
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ga] Verisign vs ICANN Sitefinder update
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 05:03:26 -0700
- Cc: General Assembly pof the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, rob.lemos@xxxxxxxx, Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All former DNPSO GA members or other interested stakehoders/users,
See: http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5086101.html
Are 40m stakeholders/users wrong or is ICANN's threat
of legal action right? Hummmmm? Lets see now.
40m stakeholders/users and Verisign vs ICANN's
250 or so folks....
Should a long term or more deliberate introduction of
Sitefinder using Wild cards been the "Right" approach
for Verisign to have taken? Or ???
Is ICANN improperly interfering with Verisign's
management of .COM and .NET TLD's? Or is Verisign
mismanaging it's responsibilities and causing harm to
stakeholders/users or just a few of the ICANN
self declared "Technical Community", whomever
that really is?
And so the ICANN disruptive and disgusting saga continues...
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|