<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Wildcards
- To: ga@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Wildcards
- From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:02:37 -0500
- In-reply-to: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPCEDCEBAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 05:35 AM, Joanna Lane wrote:
Roberto,
Thanks for the update, but you do not mention the At Large Petition to
Stop
Verisign Abuse as a factor in the BoD's forthcoming decision. Is this
an
oversight? Surely the ALAC deems 10,000+ signatures obtained in only a
matter of hours sufficiently impressive to raise a discussion at Board
level
and influence both the ALAC's and the BoD's thinking?
Hang on a second. When I put my name on that petition, I wasn't told it
was organised by ALAC.
As ALAC is a top-down creation of ICANN designed to sweep my rights
under the carpet, I don't want my name on ANYTHING to do with it.
Can someone please confirm whether ALAC was involved?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|