ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Some Wild-Card Questions

  • To: "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Some Wild-Card Questions
  • From: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx (admin)
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:49:28 -0400
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <NFBBLJNJELIAEBHKGJNMKEHMGKAA.michael@palage.com>
  • Reply-to: <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This should have been addressed BEFORE it happened.  In theory, ICANN should
have made a recommendation to the DOC who should have explicitly allowed or
prohibited the practice in the cooperative agreement.  

Now, want to hear my theory on my perpetual motion machine?

Russ Smith

>Because the ICANN Board may be required to address this issue in the

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>